Racing Hall of Fame voters face difficult choices following Clement’s passing
The recent passing of trainer Christophe Clement before his induction into the National Museum of Racing’s 2025 Hall of Fame class highlights significant flaws in the voting process — a system that failed both him and the sport he served so admirably.
Each year when the ballot arrives, the list of trainer candidates creates a sense of dread rather than celebration. The decision-making process becomes increasingly complex as careers blend together despite careful examination of earnings, Grade I victories, Eclipse Award winners, and other distinguishing factors.
This year’s ballot included Clement, Kiaran McLaughlin, Kenny McPeek, Graham Motion, Doug O’Neill, John Sadler, and John Shirreffs — each with compelling credentials that made differentiation challenging.
The concept of voting for active trainers remains problematic. Shouldn’t Hall of Fame induction serve as a capstone to a completed career rather than an honor bestowed mid-journey?
Among this year’s candidates, only Shirreffs — who recently celebrated his 80th birthday — stood out distinctly. His accomplishments include conditioning one of racing’s all-time greats in Zenyatta and becoming the first trainer to win both the GI Breeders’ Cup Classic and Ladies Classic in the same year.
Clement’s candidacy deserved more consideration. His development of stars like Gio Ponti and Tonalist (winner of the GI Belmont Stakes) demonstrated his exceptional horsemanship. His patient demeanor and willingness to engage with media and fans showcased his character. His contributions to the industry undoubtedly merit Hall of Fame recognition — yet he couldn’t secure the required majority approval.
Perhaps there was an unconscious assumption that Clement would have more opportunities for consideration. Maybe voters believed his already impressive resume would only strengthen with time. Such reasoning now seems tragically flawed.
The Hall of Fame voting process requires immediate reevaluation. For Clement’s legacy and for the integrity of racing’s highest honor, changes must be implemented to prevent similar oversights in the future.
